Translation of
Signs and Prefigurations
The Temptations of Jesus
Signs and Prefigurations in the Gospels
With the coming of Jesus, the relationship signs/revelation of God finds its fulfillment. Jesus is the sign of God par excellence, the “primordial” or “original” sign of God. In God’s communication with human beings, what comes first is Christ himself. He is the incarnate Word of God, he human face of God, God’s own body language. The Logos came to concrete existence in the person and work of Jesus of Nazareth. The mutual encounter of human beings and God takes place through the bodiliness (humanity) of Christ. No one has seen God at any time; the only begotten God who is in the bosom of the Father, He has explained Him. (John 1.18.)
In the Gospels, signs and symbolic meanings are almost omnipresent: not only in miraculous works, but in everyday “unspectacular” non-miraculous events which constitute a large part of Jesus’ ministry. To attempt a complete and systematic classification of signs, symbols and prefigurations in the Gospels goes far beyond the scope of our present study. Instead, we will content ourselves with a few selected texts which, I hope, will illustrate the scope and importance of “sign theology” as an interpretative principle for reading Scripture and understanding the Christian faith. In my opinion, it is second only to the Purpose of God.
The Temptations of Jesus
Luke 4.1-13 (NIV): 1 Jesus, full of the Holy Spirit, returned from the Jordan and was led by the Spirit in the desert, 2 where for forty days he was tempted by the devil. He ate nothing during those days, and at the end of them he was hungry. 3 The devil said to him, “If you are the Son of God, tell this stone to become bread.” 4 Jesus answered, “It is written: ‘Man does not live on bread alone.’” 5 The devil led him up to a high place and showed him in an instant all the kingdoms of the world. 6 And he said to him, “I will give you all their authority and splendor, for it has been given to me, and I can give it to anyone I want to. 7 So if you worship me, it will all be yours.” 8 Jesus answered, “It is written: ‘Worship the Lord your God and serve him only.’” 9 The devil led him to Jerusalem and had him stand on the highest point of the temple. “If you are the Son of God,” he said, “throw yourself down from here. 10 For it is written:” ‘He will command his angels concerning you to guard you carefully; 11 they will lift you up in their hands, so that you will not strike your foot against a stone.’” 12 Jesus answered, “It says: ‘Do not put the Lord your God to the test.’” 13 When the devil had finished all this tempting, he left him until an opportune time.
The first key for understanding the account of the temptations is that Jesus is going to face this trial out of obedience to the Spirit of God. The Holy Spirit, source of all revelation about God’s eternal purpose, wants the Son to go through this experience. From the very beginning, these temptations were a part of God’s plan for his Son. They are one of the conditions imposed upon the Son who is submitted to the Father’s will as he has understood it from reading Scripture.
(It is possible that the Spirit led Jesus into the desert by some kind of inner voice or direct revelation, but many passages in the Gospels seem to indicate that Jesus’ knowledge of God’s plan and timetable for him comes from his correct understanding of the Spirit’s thought as expressed in the Old Testament. Just as Israel’s temptation in the desert followed its “baptism” in the Red Sea, so does Jesus’ desert trial follow his immersion by John the Baptist.)
A number of parallels indicate that Jesus is in a sense reliving the trials that the Israelites underwent after the exodus from Egypt. Israel’s experience finds a new fulfillment in the experience of the Son of God. The difference is that where Israel succumbed to the temptations and showed itself to be unworthy of the title of son, Jesus expresses his divine sonship by his faithfulness. By his victory over Satan, he reveals himself as being, he alone, the faithful remnant, the true Israel, the only Son of God.
(1) God chose Israel as his beloved son (Exodus 4.22) and called him out of Egypt.
(2) The crossing of the Red Sea is compared by the apostle Paul (1 Corinthians 10.2) to a baptism of the people.
(3) To educate the Israelites as a father educates his son, God leads them into the desert by a pillar of fire and a pillar of cloud, images which represent the Spirit of God (Isaiah 63.11, 14).
(4) The trial of Israel lasts “40” years (Deuteronomy 8.2; 9.9 with 1 Kings 19.8). The temptations of Jesus last “40” days.
(5) All three answers that Jesus gives to Satan are quoted from chapters 6 and 8 of Deuteronomy (8.3; 6.13; 6.16), which are a theological commentary on Israel wilderness wanderings.
The itinerary of the chosen people, the “son of God”, called out of Egypt across the waters of the Red Sea and bound for the promised land is thus a prophetic prefiguration of the ministry to be accomplished by the Messiah. Jesus assumes in his own person the prefigurative history of Israel and brings it to its fulfillment.
The baptism of Jesus has just inaugurated his messianic ministry, a ministry of the suffering servant who gives his life to redeem men from their sins. The Messiah will establish his glorious reign only by accepting a life of humiliation and a violent death. The three temptations of Jesus all have essentially the same point. The devil offers an alternative program which entails no humiliations, no dangers, no sufferings and especially no cross. All of Satan’s tactics are designed to persuade Jesus to not go down the road of suffering that the Father had marked out for him in the Old Testament.
The point of the first temptation is the idea that adversity (hunger and fatigue) is incompatible with the dignity of the Messiah. And yet it is God who has submitted his Son to the trial of hunger, in order to teach him obedience (Deuteronomy 8.1-5; Hebrews 5.8). Jesus refuses to nullify by a miracle God’s purpose, even if this purpose involves hardships. 4 The rabble with them began to crave other food, and again the Israelites started wailing and said, “If only we had meat to eat! 5 We remember the fish we ate in Egypt at no cost—also the cucumbers, melons, leeks, onions and garlic. 6 But now we have lost our appetite; we never see anything but this manna!” (Numbers 11:4-6.) Jesus answers: “It is written: ‘Man does not live on bread alone.’” (Luke 4.4.)
The second temptation appeals to the prophetic promises that universal dominion over all nations would be given to the Messiah. Ask of me, and I will make the nations your inheritance, the ends of the earth your possession. (Psalm 2.8.) God promises the Messiah universal rule; Satan makes him the same promise. Which of the two is lying? Can the devil give the kingdoms to Jesus? No, God alone possesses sovereignty over the nations and does with them anything he what he wants to. “The Most High is sovereign over the kingdoms of men and gives them to anyone he wishes.” (Daniel 4.25.) God alone has the prerogative of giving the Messiah all power on earth and in heaven.
Having said that, God allows the devil to exercise great influence over the kingdoms of the world and even to secure political power and glory for his human lackeys (Revelation 13). But this influence is the influence of lies, deception and corruption; it is exercised through hunger for glory, violence, greed, militarism, injustice, the worship of power. Behind every political idolatry hides the twisted face of Satan.
Once again, Jesus’ answer presents a vivid contrast with Israel’s attitude. As they enter the land of Canaan, the chosen people will be tempted to worship the gods that are honored in the land and who are considered its masters. They will seek to gain their favor, they will act as if the conquest and the enjoyment of the land depended on their good graces instead of on God’s. In the same way, the Son of God is to receive authority over a pagan and idolatrous world that has fallen under the power of the dark prince. Wouldn’t it be wise for Jesus to seek to make with Satan, the prince of this world, the same compromises that the Israelites sought to make with the canaanite gods? To follow another path to kingship, the path followed by the great political leaders of the world: not accepting suffering but inflicting suffering?
For Jesus, to turn away from God’s methods and to adopt the methods of the world is idolatry. “It is written: ‘Worship the Lord your God and serve him only.’” (Luke 4.8.)
Satan’s strategy in the third temptation is not for Jesus to back up his claim to messiahship by impressing the crowds of Jerusalem with a spectacular sign, but to want God to miraculously get him out of any dangerous or painful situation. Jesus knows and accepts (John 12.27-28; Matthew 26.51-54) that God has destined the Messiah to be despised and rejected of men, a man of sorrows, familiar with suffering (Isaiah 53.3), in order to bear our infirmities. The Israelites, having just been freed from Egyptian slavery, were afraid that they would die of thirst in the desert and complained against God: “Is the Lord among us or not?” (Exodus 17.7.) Jesus refuses to test God by acting as if his calling and special mission should protect him against all danger that could threaten him.
This account is meant to teach us not only that Jesus is the Messiah but also in what manner he intends to accomplish his messianic mission. Two different paths open up before him: one would be easy and pleasing to his human nature; the other is the path of self-denial and suffering. To follow the first path would be to imitate Israel’s faithlessness in the desert and to put himself in Satan’s service. No, here at the beginning of his ministry, Jesus will deliberately choose the path of faithfulness to God’s purpose. The Son refuses to be the temporal political Messiah his people are dreaming of, because that, ultimately, is exactly where Satan wants to lead him. Jesus knows that he cannot adopt the popular conceptions of messiahship without betraying God’s plan. It is the Father he intends to serve, in a humble and loving obedience that will lead him all the way to the cross.
Prayer
Lord, be yourself our strength in times of trial. May the grace of humility keep us in fear of betrayal and careful watchfulness. May your grace keep us in your paths, in giving us victory over our enemies, both visible and invisible, and lead us to the goal that we wish to attain: the eternal temple of your glory. Amen.
The Boy Jesus at the Temple
2. The Boy Jesus at the Temple
From the idea that Jesus fulfills Old Testament prefigurations, let’s go to an example of how the evangelists (Luke, in this case) report events in Jesus’ life that are in themselves prefigurations of his true mission.
Luke 2.41-51: 41 Every year his parents went to Jerusalem for the Feast of the Passover. 42 When he was twelve years old, they went up to the Feast, according to the custom. 43 After the Feast was over, while his parents were returning home, the boy Jesus stayed behind in Jerusalem, but they were unaware of it. 44 Thinking he was in their company, they traveled on for a day. Then they began looking for him among their relatives and friends. 45 When they did not find him, they went back to Jerusalem to look for him. 46 After three days they found him in the temple courts, sitting among the teachers, listening to them and asking them questions. 47 Everyone who heard him was amazed at his understanding and his answers. 48 When his parents saw him, they were astonished. His mother said to him, “Son, why have you treated us like this? Your father and I have been anxiously searching for you.” 49 “Why were you searching for me?” he asked. “Didn’t you know I had to be in my Father’s house?” 50 But they did not understand what he was saying to them. 51 Then he went down to Nazareth with them and was obedient to them. But his mother treasured all these things in her heart.
At the age of twelve, Jesus impresses the teachers of the temple by his religious knowledge. He understands Scripture, he knows what God expects from man, he is conscious of his own duties toward his Father. (Today, if parents lost track of their twelve-year-old child, it isn’t likely they would find him in a church!) Jesus’ wisdom (Luke 2.52) consists specifically of that: he is not just a naturally talented child prodigy. The wisdom he shows here is a sign of the role he will fulfill later in his life: teacher, prophet, revealer of God’s purpose. This role falls to him by right because of his understanding of God’s will, gleaned from Scripture.
Jesus’ behavior toward his parents in this incident might seem strange to us, even insolent. Maybe that is why Luke takes care at the end of the story (Luke 2.51) to report that Jesus was an obedient child, submitted to his parents’ authority.
The key to this episode is to be found in the mysterious statement in Luke 2.49, the first words spoken by Jesus in the Gospels. This saying is Jesus’ answer to a rebuke from his mother and takes the form of a question which is a counter-rebuke. To Mary’s “We have been anxiously searching for you”, Jesus replies, “Why were you searching for me?” A second question explains the rebuke. Mary and Joseph would have not searched for him had they known what they should have known. “Didn’t you know I had to be in my Father’s house?” (Luke 1.49.) That implies that they should have known. But how could they have known?
The answer is no doubt to be found in the verb dei, “must”, which expresses an obligation originating from God’s will: this “must” happen because God has decreed it so. In the Gospels, Jesus sees his whole life and work in light of the will of God expressed as a divine necessity (dei, 18 occurrences in Luke alone). This divine necessity is most clearly visible in the passion of Christ: the purpose of God, revealed in the Old Testament, must, necessarily, be fulfilled (Luke 9.22; 17.25; 22.37; 24.7, 26, 44). Jesus speaks of a duty towards his Father, a duty which takes precedence over his obligations toward his parents: the accomplishment, in his life, of the divine plan written in Scripture.
Jesus’ parents could have known and should have known, for what happened could not have not happened: it was written in Scripture. “Did you not know?” is the equivalent the more explicit formula often used by Jesus, “Have you never read in the Scriptures?” Instead of asking their relatives and friends, instead of running around searching the streets and inns, Mary and Joseph should have taken time to reflect on the teachings of Scripture.
The words of Jesus about his duty towards his Father are not understood by his parents. No more than his words warning about the mystery of his passion will be understood by his disciples. Even after the events, they will still not understand. To open their minds, Jesus will have to go over with them and explain the Law, the Prophets and the Psalms (Luke 24.25-27, 45-46). If the apostles had grasped the meaning of the Scriptures better, they would not have been caught unawares (scandalized) by these events.
The symbolic meaning of the temple incident and of the enigmatic statement made by the boy Jesus on this occasion seems to emerge from a comparison between our text and the last chapter of Luke, between the incident that marks Jesus’ first Passover visit to Jerusalem and the events that take place during his last Passover in Jerusalem. In light of the links between these two accounts, Jesus’ visit to the temple in Luke 2 appears as a prefiguration, a sign that “pre-enacts” the Passover of his passion, resurrection and ascension.
In fact, the points of contact between the recovery of Jesus in Luke 2 and the events of Luke 24 are numerous. The attitude of Jesus’ parents who cannot “find” the missing child and who begin to “search” frantically for him is not without parallel to the attitude of the women at the tomb, who search for Jesus but cannot find him. Same thing for the rebuke: “Why were you searching for me?” (Luke 2.49.) and the angels’ rebuke in “Why do you look for the living among the dead?” (Luke 24.5.) The fearful anxiety of the parents (Luke 2.48) can be compared to the emotional turmoil of the disciples on the road to Emmaus and in the upper room. The necessity expressed by dei in Luke 2.49 recurs over and over in Luke 24 (24.7, 21, 46). Another parallel: the duration of Jesus’ disappearance, which corresponds to the length of time he spent hidden in the grave before his resurrection: three days (Luke 2.46; 24.7, 21, 46).
Quite obviously, the obligation for Jesus to “be in my Father’s house” (Luke 2.49) does not require that he stay non-stop in the Temple of Jerusalem. From that, we can infer the Easter fulfillment of this prefiguration: the divine glory into which Jesus will enter by his death, resurrection and ascension (Luke 24.26). His real place is at his Father’s right hand (John 20.17), the house to which he is going in order to prepare a place for his people (John 14.2-3): heaven. God does not mean for Jesus to stay and rule as an earthly king in Jerusalem, surrounded by his followers. He is rather to return to the Father and rule from a heavenly throne.
At the time, Jesus’ parents do not understand the meaning of his words, but all will become clear after the resurrection, once Jesus has explained the meaning of the Scriptures. This is an early example of the pattern reproduced over and over throughout the gospel. Certain sayings or actions of Jesus are difficult to understand because they concern the future. Their meaning will become clear only when, once the event has taken place, its conformity to the oracles of Scripture is recognized. Luke’s remark about Mary’s attitude (Luke 2.51) also illustrates this process.
For those familiar with the language of the Bible, the expression “kept all these things in her heart” has almost a technical meaning. The things that one keeps in his heart always refer to revelations about future events, revelations that are often obscure and whose meaning will only be revealed once the events are fulfilled. “To keep in one’s heart” is the attitude of one who is waiting for the fulfillment of a prophecy, the accomplishment of a sign or an omen. The revelation that has just been received makes him attentive to what will follow.
Origen correctly understood Luke’s remark about Mary: “She knew that a time would come when that which was hidden would become manifest.” In the meantime, she treasures the memory of what which had been entrusted to her in an obscure way. She meditates on these things, no doubt seeking how they will be fulfilled and comparing them to the prophecies of Scripture.
By the time Luke wrote his gospel, the time had come; God’s purpose had been completely fulfilled on Easter day. It was then that what had been obscure became clear. It was then that the disciples began to understand the prophetic prefiguration of Jesus’ being lost and being found again “after three days” in his Father’s house.
Prayer. Lord, please grant that we profit from your light with obedience, that we admire your wisdom with fruit and that, if we ever have the misfortune of losing you, we also have the joy of finding you again forever. May our eyes remain continually on you in order to carry out your will at your first word. Amen.
Jesus Changes Water to Wine
3. Jesus Changes Water to Wine
In John 2.1-12, we come to the first “miraculous” sign performed by Jesus in the fourth gospel: the water turned to wine at the marriage feast of Cana. One French translator of the Gospel calls this miracle, not just the “first” sign but the “prototype” of the signs. One more good reason to choose it as our first example of Jesus’ supernatural works.
John 2.1-11: 1 On the third day a wedding took place at Cana in Galilee. Jesus’ mother was there, 2 and Jesus and his disciples had also been invited to the wedding. 3 When the wine was gone, Jesus’ mother said to him, “They have no more wine.” 4 “Dear woman, why do you involve me?” Jesus replied, “My time has not yet come.” 5 His mother said to the servants, “Do whatever he tells you.” 6 Nearby stood six stone water jars, the kind used by the Jews for ceremonial washing, each holding from twenty to thirty gallons. 7 Jesus said to the servants, “Fill the jars with water”; so they filled them to the brim. 8 Then he told them, “Now draw some out and take it to the master of the banquet.” They did so, 9 and the master of the banquet tasted the water that had been turned into wine. He did not realize where it had come from, though the servants who had drawn the water knew. Then he called the bridegroom aside 10 and said, “Everyone brings out the choice wine first and then the cheaper wine after the guests have had too much to drink; but you have saved the best till now.” 11 This, the first of his miraculous signs, Jesus performed in Cana of Galilee. He thus revealed his glory, and his disciples put their faith in him.
At first look, this miracle seems a bit frivolous. The occasion hardly seems to deserve a miraculous manifestation of divine omnipotence. After all, this is not a matter of restoring an only son to a grieving widow or of healing a terribly suffering sick person, or of helping the unfortunate in their extreme state of need. It is just a matter of helping a local family out of an embarrassing situation because they have run out of wine for a wedding feast. Why does Jesus bother to get mixed up in this?
John himself defines the significance of this episode by calling it a “sign” (Greek, semeion), and it will be up to us to discover what this sign might signify: what is the symbolic meaning of the Jesus’ act and why John thought it important to include this story in his gospel. Remember that with signs, there is a hidden meaning to find in what happens on the surface. The action will take place on two different levels at the same time: a literal, material, surface level; and a deeper, symbolic level.
Many have wanted to see, in Mary’s comment, “They have no more wine,” a request that Jesus do a miracle. But that is stretching the meaning of the text. In reality, Mary doesn’t ask for anything at all; she just tells Jesus that there is no more wine. This fits perfectly into the normal pattern of miracle stories in the fourth gospel. They begin with someone pointing out a pressing need for which there seems to exist no human solution (compare John 5.7; 6.7; 11.39). “Sir, I have no one to help me into the pool.” “Eight months’ wages would not buy enough bread for each one to have a bite!” “But Lord, by this time there is a bad odor, for he has been there four days.” At Cana, Mary is the one who reports a situation of distress to which she sees no remedy.
Behind the words of Mary, on the symbolic level, we can discern the voice of Israel’s faithful remnant: the true Jews who are waiting for the Messiah’s reign and for the divine blessings it will bring. In fact, in the Scriptures, wine, and especially abundant wine, often symbolizes the joy that God has promised to his people, the great joy of the Messianic age. Amos 9.13: “The days are coming,” declares the Lord, “when the reaper will be overtaken by the plowman and the planter by the one treading grapes. New wine will drip from the mountains and flow from all the hills.” (See also Joel 4.18; Zechariah 9.16) Wine will flow freely when the Messiah comes, symbol of joy and abundant spiritual blessings.
On the level of the concrete event, Mary is talking about a merely material shortage. Jesus views the situation from a higher plane. For him, Mary is unintentionally voicing the spiritual distress of the true Israel, painfully waiting for the salvation promised by God. Jesus sees her as speaking for the poor in spirit, those who mourn, those who hunger and thirst after righteousness: all the true Jews whose deep longings even the “true religion” of Moses cannot fulfill.
Jesus’ answer to Mary is literally “Woman, what is there between you and me?” This is a Hebrew expression which appears in the Bible with different shades of meaning according to the context. It means, generally, “What do we have in common?” If this question follows a request, it expresses a refusal. But at Cana, Jesus does not refuse anything because Mary has not asked for anything.
The expression seems to convey in this context a difference of viewpoints. You might translate it: “You and I are not on the same wavelength.” Mary is worried about an immediate material situation; she is wondering how the hosts are going to save the party. Jesus tells her, “We are not on the same plane. You are looking at this situation humanly, with human concerns; I am looking at it from the viewpoint of my mission.” Where Mary sees only an embarrassing social situation, Jesus sees, with all the underlying symbolism, the perfect opportunity to begin to show who he is and what he has come to do.
Grammatically, Jesus’ next sentence can be understood as a negative statement (“My hour has not yet come.”) or as a question (“Hasn’t my hour already come?”). Ancient manuscripts had no punctuation, the choice depends on the interpretation of the context. A negative sense is hard to reconcile with the rest of the story. If Jesus is making a categorical and even harsh refusal (“No way, lady!”), how is it that he goes ahead and performs the miracle anyway? Along with several French translators, I believe this is a question. Jesus is inviting Mary to consider this situation in a different way, from a higher plane. He invites her to discover that the time has come for him to intervene as the Messiah in accordance with the purpose of God.
In John’s gospel, the “Hour” of Jesus always refers to the time when he will definitively accomplish the purpose of God. Concretely, this Hour is the moment of his death, resurrection and ascension. That is when Jesus will fully manifest his glory, will enter into his reign and will reveal eternal life.
Strictly speaking, the Hour will not come until the end of Christ’s life, some three years after Cana. But, in the meantime, this Hour is already present, in advance, in the form of the signs that Jesus performs. The miracle of Cana will be the first sign, the first movie trailer, foretelling the Hour when Jesus will fully accomplish the mission for which the Father has sent him into the world.
Mary seems to sense that Jesus is going to do something, even if she doesn’t know what he has in mind. On the symbolic level, she is again speaking as the representative of the faithful remnant. Exodus 19.8: The people all responded together, “We will do everything the Lord has said.” She accepts in advance the as yet unknown conditions of the new covenant that God will conclude through Jesus.
Jesus is not just going to perform a magic trick or even an act of divine power. He will symbolically provide Israel with the wine of the messianic feast. He is acting out a prefiguration of the new age of salvation that will be inaugurated by his Hour. John specifies that the stone jars are six in number and that they were intended for the purification, that is the ceremonial washing, of the Jews. Both of these details are important and have symbolic significance.
Instead of the clay amphorae normally used to keep wine, Jesus uses stone jars reserved for a religious usage typical of Judaism. Mark 7.3: The Pharisees and all the Jews do not eat unless they give their hands a ceremonial washing, holding to the tradition of the elders. What the Law of Moses could only represent symbolically, what any religious practice can only promise but never actually give, Jesus will accomplish it fully, to the brim.
This symbolism is confirmed by the number of jars. The number 6 (a failed and incomplete 7, 7 being the number of divine fullness and perfection) evokes the idea of imperfection to the Jew. Here, it underlines how much the old covenant was imperfect, unable to purify the conscience and give life.
The size of the jars is also a significant detail. The six jars, filled to the brim, would contain between 480 and 720 liters (120 to 180 gallons). That would be between 640 and 960 bottles of wine: way more than enough to supply the needs of a small village wedding feast. The wine furnished by Jesus not only remedies the powerlessness of religion but goes beyond anything we can imagine.
It is also of superior quality, certified by an expert. There is more meaning in the words of the master of the banquet than he realizes. On the surface level, he is giving his opinion on the quality of the physical wine the servants have just served to him. On the symbolic level, he is proclaiming that God, after centuries of waiting, has now answered the deep longing of his people. “You have saved the best until now.” The superior wine of Christ comes after the lesser wine of the Law, and is drawn from the water of ritual purification. It is to bring out this symbolism that Jesus performs this prophetic sign. Origen wrote, “At Cana, the Lord brings joy. Before his coming, Scripture was water; after, it became wine.”
In verse 11, John calls this miracle the first, or the “prototype” of Jesus’ signs. In the synoptic gospels, Jesus inaugurates his public ministry, not by a miracle, but by a proclamation. Luke 4.18-19 : 18 “The Spirit of the Lord is on me, because he has anointed me to preach good news to the poor. He has sent me to proclaim freedom for the prisoners and recovery of sight for the blind, to release the oppressed, 19 to proclaim the year of the Lord’s favor.” Mark 1.14-15: 14 After John was put in prison, Jesus went into Galilee, proclaiming the good news of God. 15 “The time has come,” he said. “The kingdom of God is near. Repent and believe the good news!”
In John, the sign of Cana takes the place of this proclamation. It shows symbolically that the time has come when the Messiah will accomplish the purpose of God in behalf of mankind, when the promise of perfect and infinite joy will be fulfilled to the brim.
Prayer
Lord, show us again your power and your goodness by changing the weakness of our hearts into the strength and joy of your Spirit. Grant that, drunk with the good wine of your love, we may lose our taste for the false pleasures of this world. Grant that, always ready to do whatever you say, according to your viewpoint and your timetable, we might receive our reward on the last day. Amen.
Jesus Feeds the Five Thousand
4. Jesus Feeds the Five Thousand
Luke 9:10-17: 10 When the apostles returned, they reported to Jesus what they had done. Then he took them with him and they withdrew by themselves to a town called Bethsaida, 11 but the crowds learned about it and followed him. He welcomed them and spoke to them about the kingdom of God, and healed those who needed healing. 12 Late in the afternoon the Twelve came to him and said, “Send the crowd away so they can go to the surrounding villages and countryside and find food and lodging, because we are in a remote place here.” 13 He replied, “You give them something to eat.” They answered, “We have only five loaves of bread and two fish—unless we go and buy food for all this crowd.” 14 (About five thousand men were there.) But he said to his disciples, “Have them sit down in groups of about fifty each.” 15 The disciples did so, and everybody sat down. 16 Taking the five loaves and the two fish and looking up to heaven, he gave thanks and broke them. Then he gave them to the disciples to set before the people. 17 They all ate and were satisfied, and the disciples picked up twelve basketfuls of broken pieces that were left over.
This miracle, the only one to be recounted in all four gospels, is not just intended to relieve a human need but to signify symbolically that the messianic times have arrived and that Jesus is himself the Messiah. The symbolic meaning of the sign is concentrated particularly in the conclusion, which is formulated in the same way in all four accounts. They all ate and were satisfied, and the disciples picked up twelve basketfuls of broken pieces that were left over. (Luke 9.17.)
Everyone has eaten his fill, and there is still bread left over. The translation “broken” pieces can be misleading. These are not crumbs or half-eaten crusts with teeth marks all around them. These are extra portions, broken off by Jesus to distribute to the crowd, whole untouched helpings: twelve basketfuls. Twelve! Like the twelve tribes of Israel and the twelve apostles. This number had a symbolic meaning for the Jews: it spoke of the people of God in its totality. The bread of Jesus cannot be limited to the five thousand; there is enough to satisfy the whole people of God.
The feeding of the multitude signifies the period of spiritual plenty that the Messiah is to usher in, the joy, the “abundant” eternal life that the coming of the reign of God will bring. Jesus is showing in symbol that this reign is near and that the messianic blessings that come with it will satisfy the people to the full and quench their deepest hunger. They will be, just like their ancestors who ate manna in the desert, filled with the bread of life come down from heaven. In his reign, the Messiah will provide for all their spiritual needs. “Blessed are you who hunger now, for you will be satisfied.” (Luke 6.21.)
What Jesus gives goes far beyond immediate needs and material necessities. The food he offers calms more than physical hunger. This mysterious, filling, abundant bread prefigures nothing less than the gift of eternal life. Everything that fulfills man’s deepest longings, everything the Old Testament had looked forward to— all of that is given in the person of Jesus, in his sacrificial death. The best commentary on this story is Jesus’ discourse on the bread of life in John 6. “I am the living bread that came down from heaven. If anyone eats of this bread, he will live forever. This bread is my flesh, which I will give for the life of the world.” (John 6.51.)
Passages such as Exodus 16 and Numbers 11 certainly constitute the background of this miracle. They tell how the people were nourished in the desert by bread from heaven (Exodus 16.4). In calling himself, “the living bread that came down from heaven”, Jesus is using one of the great symbols that reveal him as savior, fulfilling the hope of the Old Testament. To eat of this bread means to believe on him. What every man hungers and thirsts for, ultimately, is God himself. Any other food will leave him unsatisfied.
The image of being filled is related to the image of the messianic feast, which represents the reign as a great meal with all the redeemed in attendance. This idea was very familiar to Jesus’ contemporaries, and he himself makes use of it repeatedly in his teaching (Luke 14.15-24; 13.27-29; 16.21; etc.). The reign of the Messiah is at hand, the table is set, the banquet is ready, the hope of men is fulfilled and they will be satisfied if they accept to believe the good news.
Where Jesus satisfies the hunger of the crowd, the disciples are completely helpless. For them, to feed this multitude is humanly impossible. The human solution they propose is pretty lame–we could get some take-out if we only had the money. They follow Jesus, but they have not yet recognized who he is, and it is in vain that he tries to nudge their faith forward. Jesus replied, “They do not need to go away. You give them something to eat.” (Matthew 14.16.) But the disciples do not catch on, not even after seeing the miracle. For they had not understood about the loaves; their minds were closed. (Mark 6.52.) Their unintelligent minds could not grasp the deep meaning of what had happened. The miracle that Jesus had performed and the words he said to “signify” his mission had not been understood.
Prayer. Are we not, o God, in the same situation as the hungry crowd who did not recognize who you really are? We are not filled by eating the living bread of heaven when we eat it out of obligation, when we eat it without acquiring strength to do good and flee evil, when we eat it while yet yearning for the poison dishes offered by the world, by the flesh and by sin. Lord, please first teach us and enlighten us, then heal us and finally nourish us and fill us so much with yourself that we repelled by everything that comes from the world. Amen.
The Calling of Levi
5. The Calling of Levi
Luke 5:27-32: 27 After this, Jesus went out and saw a tax collector by the name of Levi sitting at his tax booth. “Follow me,” Jesus said to him, 28 and Levi got up, left everything and followed him. 29 Then Levi held a great banquet for Jesus at his house, and a large crowd of tax collectors and others were eating with them. 30 But the Pharisees and the teachers of the law who belonged to their sect complained to his disciples, “Why do you eat and drink with tax collectors and ‘sinners’?” 31 Jesus answered them, “It is not the healthy who need a doctor, but the sick. 32 I have not come to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance.”
Tax collectors collaborate with the occupation forces of Rome; their contact with pagans made them impure in the eyes of respectable Jews. The term “sinners” refers here to Jews who do not live in conformity to the dictates of the Mosaic law, outcasts who are pushed to the margins of a theocratic society governed by religion. For the Pharisees, almost all the common people, without rabbinical training, are transgressors of the Law and therefore impure. John 7.48-49: 48 “Has any of the rulers or of the Pharisees put his trust in him? 49 No! But this mob that knows nothing of the law—there is a curse on them.”
Pharisee custom forbade a practicing Jew to enter the house of a sinner or to eat with him, for fear of being ritually contaminated. He could never be certain that these people observed the traditional rules of legal purity. Plus, it would also imply that he approved their behavior. The name “Pharisee” came from a word derived from the root parash, which expresses the idea of separation, of breaking off from the impure. That is why they are scandalized to see Jesus mixing with people that they themselves avoided.
In his answer, Jesus compares his actions to those of a doctor. The doctor goes to the sick because they need him and because he can help them. If Jesus keeps company with sinners, it is not because he approves of their sin but because he can save them from being lost. His mission is to call them to conversion.
This answer conceals a rebuke that Jesus makes explicit in Matthew 9.13: “But go and learn what this means: ‘I desire mercy, not sacrifice.’” Jesus means that his actions are governed by the will of God and that his listeners also should know and do this will in their own lives, since it was already clear in the Old Testament. The will of God is expressed in the word “mercy”. Worship, ritual and sacrifices come after. Those who reverse this order misunderstand the will of God and pervert his ways. They are blind guides (Matthew 23.23-24).
The Pharisees, who know the Old Testament, should know this as well as Jesus himself. The Lord, the good shepherd of Israel, considers all of the people as his own flock and does not want one single one of them to be pushed aside and lost. The contempt and scorn that the Pharisees display openly toward “sinners” prove that they are bad shepherds for Israel.
The calling of Levi into the group of disciples is thus a sign of God’s mercy. At the time he is going to establish his reign, God wants to gather all of Israel into the fold through the ministry of Jesus.
The behavior of Jesus toward sinners takes on its true meaning only if it is recognized as one of the messianic signs that characterize his ministry. The welcome he extends to them bears witness not just to the concern that God has for sinners in a general way; it bears witness more particularly to this specific time of salvation history which precedes the coming of the kingdom and the judgment of Israel. His mercy is a prophetic sign, a forerunner, an expression of the good news: repent, the reign of the God is at hand. Before the definitive coming of this kingdom, God makes one last effort to bring the sinners among his people to repentance. If God is so concerned about seeking and saving that which was lost, it is because the time is fulfilled. The behavior that Jesus is criticized for is thus inherent in his mission as a messenger of the kingdom in Israel.
Jesus must not only proclaim verbally the imminent coming of this kingdom, he is to manifest its imminence by the signs he performs: exorcisms, healings, miracles. These signs show that God has already begun the intervention which will lead to the establishment of the Messiah’s reign. In them, he has already started to reveal the blessings God wishes to shower on his people, especially those who are most in need.
Jesus’ concern for and eating with sinners have the same meaning. That is why they are to be understood as signs: they attest in symbol that the reign of God is near, that already its effects are making themselves felt in advance. Effects of grace, because God wants to establish his reign not to condemn sinners but to save them.
Prayer
Our Lord, we were all sinners, that is why you looked upon us with the eyes of mercy. Yes, it was for all of us that you sent your Son. If you want sinners, here we are. You call us to conversion, we embrace it with all our heart. Hold up our courage, break our bonds, so that we can follow you with the same joy and promptness as Levi, the tax-collector. Destroy our rebellious and ever recurring desires, so that we can persevere in your grace like your chosen apostle. Amen.
Jesus Calms the Storm
6. Jesus Calms the Storm
Luke 8.22-25: 22 One day Jesus said to his disciples, “Let’s go over to the other side of the lake.” So they got into a boat and set out. 23 As they sailed, he fell asleep. A squall came down on the lake, so that the boat was being swamped, and they were in great danger. 24 The disciples went and woke him, saying, “Master, Master, we’re going to drown!” He got up and rebuked the wind and the raging waters; the storm subsided, and all was calm. 25 “Where is your faith?” he asked his disciples. In fear and amazement they asked one another, “Who is this? He commands even the winds and the water, and they obey him.”
This miracle, along with all of Jesus’ other nature miracles, contributes in its own way to proclaim the imminent coming of the Messiah’s reign. Jesus comes to save man in his natural setting, with all of creation. In this episode, he acts as God. He rebukes the lake, just as God rebuked the Red Sea (Psalm 106.9); he calms the raging waters, just as God stilled the roaring of the seas (Psalm 65.7; 89.9; 107.29).
Here is revealed the Son of God, savior of the whole creation. By this admittedly limited but already powerful act, Jesus heralds, prepares and inaugurates the decisive struggle that he will lead against all the forces of evil hostile to man. In this perspective, we can understand why Christ speaks to the sea with the same words is ordinarily uses to combat demons and sickness: he “rebukes” the wind and the waves.
Jesus blames his disciples for their lack of faith. In Matthew, he calls them oligopistoi, “men of little faith”, an expression that the French translator André Chouraqi renders “pygmies of the faith”. In fact, in the life of the apostles, there is a time when they fully deserved this rebuke. Did they not lose their faith in Jesus as the Messiah when he was arrested, condemned and put to death? Their unfaith was so deep that they refused to believe the first witnesses who reported seeing the risen Messiah. In describing the disillusionment and skepticism of the two disciples on the road to Emmaus, Luke (24.21-24) perfectly depicts the state of mind among the apostles.
In this story, Luke foresees the great tempest which, on Good Friday, will threaten to engulf Jesus asleep in death and the apostles whose faith has vanished. How can we not discern in this text a veiled reference to the true storm of the passion? Luke sees in the (almost unnatural) sleep of Jesus an image of his death, a symbol of his physical absence. And yet, here, faced with the powers of chaos, faced with evil and death represented by the sea, Jesus comes back to life by divine power to save his own from mortal peril.
The Master’s sleep and the assault of the raging waters against the small boat become therefore a symbolic rehearsal of Jesus’ death. In the face of death’s power, Jesus stands upright. Under the fearful eye of the faithless disciples, his awakening prefigures the power of the Resurrected Lord, the power of salvation for the disciples and (as we shall see) even for pagans under the grip of the devil’s power.
This symbolism also prefigures the conditions necessary for the salvation of non-Jews: in order to liberate the pagans held prisoner in Satan’s grip, the Messiah has to pass through the waters of death. This whole expedition is Jesus’ own initiative: for the first time, he deliberately enters, with his disciples, into pagan territory, where he will cast a demon out of a non-Jew. This first pagan venture has a definite meaning for the apostles: it gives them the opportunity to inaugurate in a symbolic way the mission that they will assume at a later time. Even though his ministry is for the moment strictly limited to the lost sheep of the house of Israel, Jesus gives a preview of his plan to extend salvation to all men.
This nature miracle seems to impress the disciples more than all the others they had witnessed up until now. Their fear and amazement express themselves in a question about the real identity of their Teacher. They begin to suspect that he is more than just a prophet but do not yet recognize him as the Messiah. Even the disciples, to whom at this point Jesus has already begun to entrust the “mysteries of the kingdom” cannot attain to the whole truth about Jesus’ identity. For that, they will have to wait until the events of the passion.
Prayer
O divine Savior, guide the boat of our lives to the port of eternity, in spite of the storms that toss it to and fro. Multiplied temptations assail us from without and from within. Speak the word, and the tempest will be stilled; give the order “Peace, be still!”, especially to the passions that tear apart our hearts, so that we might follow only the calm guidance of your love. Amen.
The Healing of a Demon-possessed Man
7. The Healing of a Demon-possessed Man
Luke 8.26-39: 26 They sailed to the region of the Gerasenes, which is across the lake from Galilee. 27 When Jesus stepped ashore, he was met by a demon-possessed man from the town. For a long time this man had not worn clothes or lived in a house, but had lived in the tombs. 28 When he saw Jesus, he cried out and fell at his feet, shouting at the top of his voice, “What do you want with me, Jesus, Son of the Most High God? I beg you, don’t torture me!” 29 For Jesus had commanded the evil spirit to come out of the man. Many times it had seized him, and though he was chained hand and foot and kept under guard, he had broken his chains and had been driven by the demon into solitary places. 30 Jesus asked him, “What is your name?” “Legion,” he replied, because many demons had gone into him. 31 And they begged him repeatedly not to order them to go into the Abyss. 32 A large herd of pigs was feeding there on the hillside. The demons begged Jesus to let them go into them, and he gave them permission. 33 When the demons came out of the man, they went into the pigs, and the herd rushed down the steep bank into the lake and was drowned. 34 When those tending the pigs saw what had happened, they ran off and reported this in the town and countryside, 35 and the people went out to see what had happened. When they came to Jesus, they found the man from whom the demons had gone out, sitting at Jesus’ feet, dressed and in his right mind; and they were afraid. 36 Those who had seen it told the people how the demon-possessed man had been cured. 37 Then all the people of the region of the Gerasenes asked Jesus to leave them, because they were overcome with fear. So he got into the boat and left. 38 The man from whom the demons had gone out begged to go with him, but Jesus sent him away, saying, 39 “Return home and tell how much God has done for you.” So the man went away and told all over town how much Jesus had done for him.
Luke tells this story in some detail, which suggests that he is trying to draw our attention to its symbolic meaning. Jesus is entering pagan territory on a prefigurative mission among non-Jews.
The state of this man is, in fact, a very suggestive image of the spiritual situation of the pagan nations. He has been under the domination of numerous demonic powers (false gods) for a long time. He lives, not in the house of God but in the city of the dead. He is naked, a fact which, for a Jew, would call to mind the notorious sexual immorality that was rampant in pagan society. Like the great empires that had dominated the chosen people for centuries, he is endowed with colossal strength impossible to control by human means. The name “Legion” is obviously of Roman origin, the pagan power that was currently oppressing the Jews. The exorcism of this demon-possessed man is thus for Luke a prefiguration of the future Christian mission among the pagan nations, a mission that Jesus did not actively pursue during his earthly ministry.
The climax of the story presents the formerly demon-possessed Gentile in the typical position of a disciple: he is seated at Jesus’ feet, perfectly calm, ready to receive his teachings. In fact, the man would like to follow Jesus, become his disciple, but the time has not yet come to incorporate non-Jews into the messianic community that is being formed within Israel. That could very well be the meaning of the demons’ question in Matthew 8.29: “What do you want with us, Son of God?” they shouted. “Have you come here to torture us before the appointed time?” Jesus anticipates the future moment when his messianic rule will be definitively established: a day of judgment for the forces of Satan, a day of victory and enthronement for the Messiah.
The commandment given to the man to spread the news of his deliverance contrasts sharply with Jesus’ numerous and usual injunctions to silence (the messianic secret). The explanation of this difference is no doubt to be found in the location of the miracle: on the far side of the Sea of Galilee. We are in pagan territory, where the risk of triggering nationalistic messianic movements among the Jewish crowds and the risk of provoking an untimely official reaction by Jewish authorities are much smaller.
Prayer
Speak to our hearts, Lord, and they will be healed. Rebuke the demon, your enemy and ours, and all the powers of darkness which lay siege to our souls, all of the passions which war in our hearts will be dispersed and put to flight. Open our eyes and do not permit that we should run to our ruin like impure and mindless animals. Let us taste the joy of possessing you and feel what would be our loss in losing you. And, finally, dwell in us, after having taken possession of us, and grant us to be with you in time and throughout eternity. Amen.
Multiplying Loaves, Walking on Water
Multiplying Loaves
and Walking on Water
[Study presented at the Pepperdine Bible Lectures 2009]
No one can live unless he eats. Man seeks his food in obedience to the Creator’s command.
God said, “See, I have given you every plant yielding seed that is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree with seed in its fruit; you shall have them for food.” (Genesis 1.29.)
“Every moving thing that lives shall be food for you; and just as I gave you the green plants, I give you everything.” (Genesis 9.3.)
Man’s place in creation is a paradox: he has control over nature, and yet at the same time he receives it only as a gift. Food is an experience of being dependent. We do not possess life in ourselves. We receive it in our very frail bodies. And this life grows, develops and is enriched as long as we are nourished. Without food, we waste away and die. What is true of our physical life is just as true of our life in the Spirit: we need to be nourished.
The Book of Deuteronomy says this about the wilderness wanderings, where God educated his chosen people:
“He humbled you by letting you hunger, then by feeding you with manna, with which neither you nor your ancestors were acquainted, in order to make you understand that one does not live by bread alone, but by every word that comes from the mouth of the LORD.” (Deuteronomy 8.3.)
Our lives depend less on created goods than on the Word of God. In which case, the word “life” means more than biological existence; it takes on a new dimension: it is life lived in communion with God.
In John 6, through the word “bread,” the symbolism of food picks up the threads of previous symbolisms in the fourth gospel: the wine of the wedding feast of God and his people (John 2), the gift of living water promised to the Samaritan woman (John 4). Wine, water, bread: these symbols complement one another to signify, each in its own way, the divine life that Jesus gives to the believer.
“Do not work for the food that perishes, but for the food that endures for eternal life, which the Son of Man will give you. For it is on him that God the Father has set his seal.” (John 6.27.)
The Galileans in John 6 are to discern, beyond perishable food, another food, one that becomes eternal life.
For John, the feeding of the five thousand—the only miracle of Jesus that is recorded in all four gospels—is not just a demonstration of divine power, it is a “sign”: a symbolic action that points to a greater and more profound reality. Jesus is always trying to get us to see further than our eyes can see. If we stop at the outward aspect of this event, if we stop at the surface, we miss what is most essential.
Already in the fourth century, saint Augustine complained that readers of the gospel looked no further than the supernatural aspect of Jesus’s miracles:
Yet it is not enough to observe these things in the miracles of Christ. Let us interrogate the miracles themselves, what they tell us about Christ: for they have a tongue of their own, if they can be understood. This miracle, which we admire on the outside, has something within. We have seen, we have looked at something great, something glorious, and altogether divine, which could be performed only by God: we have praised the doer for the deed. But just as, if we were to inspect a beautiful writing somewhere, it would not suffice for us to praise the hand of the writer, because he formed the letters even, equal and elegant, if we did not also read the information he conveyed to us by those letters; so, he who merely inspects this deed may be delighted with its beauty to admire the doer: but he who understands does, as it were, read it. (Tractates on the Gospel of John, 24.2.)
The full meaning of the sign will appear only with the long discourse on the Bread of Life. However, the account of the miracle is perfectly understandable independant of the discourse and contains enough elements to discern its deeper meaning. The episode unfolds in five scenes: (1) the stage is set (verses 1-4); (2) the sign is prepared (verses 5-10); (3) the sign is performed (verses 11-13); (4) the sign is misunderstood (verses 14-15) ; (5) the sign is completed (versets 16-26).
The Stage is Set
1 After this Jesus went to the other side of the Sea of Galilee, also called the Sea of Tiberias. 2 A large crowd kept following him, because they saw the signs that he was doing for the sick. (John 6.1-2.)
The enthusiasm of the crowd is not to be confused with faith. These people are more interested in being healed than they are in knowing the mysterious Healer. In fact, they are the Galilean counterparts of the unbelieving Judeans of John 2.23-25: they have begun to believe in Jesus as the Messiah because of the signs he was doing, but they have no clue about the true meaning of the signs. They keep following Jesus to reap the benefits that his power can bring to their material life but not to their spiritual life.
Jesus went up the mountain and sat down there with his disciples. (John 6.3.) These geographical indications tell us more than mere places that we can locate on a map of Palestine. John writes: “Jesus went to the other side of the Sea of Galilee.” Why does he say “sea” when in reality it is only a lake? It is no doubt a reference to the Red Sea. And “the other side” of the sea brings to mind the crossing of the Red Sea under the leadership of Moses, as well as the crossing of the Jordan River on dry land to enter the Promised Land.
And when Jesus goes “up the mountain,” he is like Moses who climbed Mount Sinai and who saw God and talked to him face to face. In other words, “sea” and “mountain” are not just topographical features, but clues for faith. John wants us to understand that in the person of Jesus, a new Moses is at work, the ultimate and definitive Moses. Just like Moses, Jesus crosses the water to enter the desert, goes up a mountain, has the people sit down and feeds them.
John’s remark about the time of year also has a deeper meaning. Now the Passover, the festival of the Jews, was near. (John 6.4.) The mention of the Passover is more than an interesting chronological detail, its significance is clearly theological. During the ritual of the Jewish Passover feast, the head of the household takes the bread, offers a prayer of thanksgiving and distributes it to his guests. That is what Jesus will do during the Last Supper. There is no doubt that this story is meant to prefigure the Christian Passover: the Passover of the Lord during which Jesus will give his flesh as the bread of life.
The Sign is Prepared
When he looked up and saw a large crowd coming toward him, Jesus said to Philip, “Where are we to buy bread for these people to eat?” (John 6.5.) Jesus, sitting on the mountain, looks out on the approaching crowd. In John 4.5, the disciples are told to “look around you, and see” the Samaritans coming toward Jesus. Here, it is Jesus himself who looks on the crowd. Does he see in this crowd the “all people” that, when he is lifted up from the earth and seated in heaven, he will draw to himself (John 12.32)? Without any apparent reason, Jesus expresses worry about being able to find bread for all these people. In the discourse that he pronounces the next day in the synagogue of Capernaum, we learn that the bread represents the gift of his own life.
How can they find enough food for all these people? At first sight, Jesus seems to be reacting like Moses, who complained to God:
13 “Where am I to get meat to give to all this people? For they come weeping to me and say, ‘Give us meat to eat!’ 14 I am not able to carry all this people alone, for they are too heavy for me.” (Numbers 11.13-14.)
In John, Jesus’s question is addressed not to God but to Philip. Implicitly, it underlines the impossibility for man to procure the “true” bread.
He said this to test him. (John 6.6.) Test him? Test him about what? About the question that keeps coming back over and over in the fourth gospel: “Where?” This question pops up all the way to the story of the Passion, where Pilate asks Jesus: “Where are you from?” (John 19.9.) Origin determines identity in John. Where a thing comes from determines what it is.
Where will the bread come from? That is the real question. At the wedding feast in Cana, no one knew where the good wine came from. At Jacob’s well, the Samaritan woman did not know where to get the living water so that she will never be thirsty again. Bread, wine, water. In each case, it is Jesus himself! What exam does Philip have to pass? It’s not a test to find out if he is resourceful enough to come up with the food, it’s to find out if he can recognize the Messiah, if he can see that Jesus himself is the Bread of Life, God’s providential salvation for men. It’s a test to see if Philip knows who his Teacher really is. “Have I been with you all this time, Philip, and you still do not know me?” (John 14.9.)
But Philip does not yet understand, no more than Andrew or the other disciples. For the time being, they remain oblivious to the real meaning of what they see in the ministry of their Master.
However, John tells us that unlike the oblivious disciples and unlike a worried and uncertain Moses, Jesus has perfect knowledge of God’s plan. He said this to test him, for he himself knew what he was going to do. (John 6.6.) What did Jesus know he was going to do? We might think first off of the miracle that he was going to do, but to stop there would be to stay on the surface of the story. The miracle is only a sign which signifies a higher reality. This is what Jesus knows: For the crowd to have life, he will have to give much more than miraculous loaves of bread. He will have to give much more than the words that he received from the Father. He will have to give his very life.
Philip answered him, “Six months’ wages would not buy enough bread for each of them to get a little.” (John 6.7.) Six months’ wages: two hundred denarii according to the Greek text. Philip is stuck on the physical plane and starts making calculations. Doesn’t he know Scripture enough, hasn’t he been with Jesus enough to know that he should interpret his Master’s words symbolically? The prophet Isaiah had used the same symbolic language:
Ho, everyone who thirsts, come to the waters; and you that have no money, come, buy and eat! Come, buy wine and milk without money and without price. (Isaiah 55.1.)
Behind the image of free food, God invites Israel to seek that which truly satisfies man’s hunger and gives life: his Word. By testing him with a question, Jesus wants to open Philip’s mind to what the physical bread symbolizes. The answer will be given by Peter at the end of the chapter: “Lord, to whom can we go? You have the words of eternal life.” (John 6.68.)
8 One of his disciples, Andrew, Simon Peter's brother, said to him, 9 “There is a boy here who has five barley loaves and two fish. But what are they among so many people?” (John 6.8-9.) It is not a simple coincidence that the five loaves are made from barley: the bread of the poor. The barley loaves are a reference to the story of the prophet Elisha, who leads a group of men into the desert and feeds them miraculously with loaves of barley bread.
42 A man came from Baal-shalishah, bringing food from the first fruits to the man of God: twenty loaves of barley and fresh ears of grain in his sack. Elisha said, “Give it to the people and let them eat.” 43 But his servant said, “How can I set this before a hundred people?” So he repeated, “Give it to the people and let them eat, for thus says the LORD, ‘They shall eat and have some left.’” 44 He set it before them, they ate, and had some left, according to the word of the LORD. (2 Kings 4.42-44.)
What is going to happen in the hills surrounding the Sea of Galilee is an extension of the ancient story of Elisha. There is here not only a new Moses, there is also a new Elisha. Jesus fulfills and surpasses everything in the Law and the Prophets.
The Sign is Performed
Jesus said, “Make the people sit down.” Now there was a great deal of grass in the place; so they sat down, about five thousand in all. (John 6.10.) The French Hellenist Édouard Delebecque translates the beginning of the verse: “Make them sit down like at the table.” These people are being seated for a meal, sitting down or stretched out on the grass. In the Greek text of verse 11, they are called anakeimenoi: guests. Jesus is not just handing out free food, he is presiding over a communal meal, a “table community”. The kingdom of God—is often portrayed in the gospels by the image of a feast, especially a wedding feast. The Feeding of the Five Thousand will be a material prophetic acting out of the messianic feast and will prefigure, just as the Lord’s Supper will prefigure, its definitive and eternal fulfillment in heaven.
Then Jesus took the loaves, and when he had given thanks, he distributed them to those who were seated; so also the fish, as much as they wanted. (John 6.11.) By fully satisfying their hunger, Jesus is repeating what God did for his people in the wilderness. For, that is what Jesus is doing: the works of his Father.
23 Yet he commanded the skies above, and opened the doors of heaven; 24 he rained down on them manna to eat, and gave them the grain of heaven. 25 Mortals ate of the bread of angels; he sent them food in abundance. (Psalm 74.23-25.)
The source of life that is in God passed through the hands of the man Jesus, and Jesus can have it act on the bread. He can multiply the bread instantaneously just as he multiplies the grain in the fields with the help of time, rain and sun.
When they were satisfied, he told his disciples, “Gather up the fragments left over, so that nothing may be lost.” (John 6.12.) This instruction given to the disciples is a bit surprising. Why would Jesus be so concerned about what seems to be a minor detail? Was he really that worried about wasting good food? Actually, the existence of leftover bread is essential to the meaning of the sign and refers back to the story of Elisha: they ate, and had some left, according to the word of the LORD (2 Kings 4.44). Rather than “fragments” (crumbs, crusts, half-eaten loaves with teeth marks all over them), the leftovers are whole loaves, whole helpings that were not used.
The key for understanding the meaning of this order is found in the verb “to not be lost.” Later, at the beginning of his discourse on the Bread of Life, Jesus draws a contrast between two types of food. “Do not work for the food that perishes, but for the food that endures for eternal life, which the Son of Man will give you.” (John 6.27.) Jesus does not perform this sign to merely satisfy the physical hunger of five thousand Galileans, but to point them to the life—divine life, eternal life—that he has come to offer. The leftover bread must not be allowed to perish, to be lost, because it symbolizes this other food that endures for life everlasting. Jesus is trying to direct their minds from the temporal to the eternal. He wants to lead them to a spiritual understanding of the sign.
The leftover bread has a second purpose: it shows the contrast between the bread that Jesus gives and the manna given to Israel in the wilderness. The Hebrews also had their fill of bread (Exodus 16.1-21), but the manna rotted if they tried to save some for the next day. The bread that Jesus gives, however, is meant to last forever.
So they gathered them up, and from the fragments of the five barley loaves, left by those who had eaten, they filled twelve baskets. (John 6.13.) Here is the key, the one detail that stands out in all four gospel accounts. Twelve! Like the twelve sons of Jacob, the twelve tribes of Israel and the twelve Apostles. In the numerical symbolism of the Bible, twelve is the number of God’s people in its totality. The miracle of the bread that satisfies the hunger of the crowd is not limited to the five thousand; there is enough left over to satisfy the spiritual hunger of all the generations to come. The bread of the Christ is meant for the whole people of God, in every time and in every place.
The meaning of this miracle is christological: it teaches us something about the identity and the work of the Christ; it is typological: it links Jesus to two “types” or prefigurations of the Old Testament: Moses and Elisha; it is eschatological: it concerns “the last days” (that is, the messianic era) since it presents Jesus as the definitive fulfillment of the Jewish prophecies and prefigures the heavenly feast; it is symbolic, for example, in its way of using numbers; and it is liturgical, it prefigures the Lord’s Supper.
The Sign is Misunderstood
There is no doubt that the crowd understands something of what has happened on the mountain: the miracle of the manna has been outdone, the miracle of Elisha as well. When the people saw the sign that he had done, they began to say, “This is indeed the prophet who is to come into the world.” (John 6.14.) The crowd recognizes that Jesus is not simply a prophet, but the prophet, the one promised by God who would be like Moses.
“The LORD your God will raise up for you a prophet like me from among your own people; you shall heed such a prophet.” (Deuteronomy 18.15.)
According to popular Jewish expectation in Palestine at the time of the Roman occupation, this prophet would be the liberator of his people, just as Moses had in the past delivered the Hebrews from Egyptian slavery. His coming would usher in for Israel a new era of political supremacy over the nations and economic prosperity. Revolutionary leaders (someone counted sixty-two who appeared in New Testament times), such as Theudas and the Egyptian Jewish rebel leader mentioned in the Book of Acts, claimed to be the Prophet. Promising that they would perform miraculous signs like those of Moses, they led their followers to famous sites of Jewish history, to the Jordan or to the desert. The promised miracles materialized, but Roman troops did, and it was a massacre.
Reading the sign of the loaves according to their own human religious ideas (which John in his gospel calls the “flesh”), the crowds fail to grasp the real meaning of the miracle. What they see is a confirmation of their false, preconceived ideas about the Messiah. These Galileans are seeking themselves, not God; they are following their own messianic dreams instead of opening their minds to God’s purpose. They are seeking their own bread and not his. They want a king who will take care of them and all their material needs, especially food and health. How great it would be to have as their national leader someone invested with such powers! With Jesus leading them, they can march on Jerusalem, overthrow the Romans and establish the ultimate welfare state.
Jesus is not blind. He sees that they want in reality is a king in the human, worldly sense. When Jesus realized that they were about to come and take him by force to make him king, he withdrew again to the mountain by himself. (John 6.15.) Jesus turns away from a glory that would turn him away from his real mission. He withdraws, alone, to the mountain, in order to pray according to Matthew and Luke, to be with the One from whom he receives true glory. He resists the temptation of power, as he did during the forty days of testing in the desert at the beginning of his ministry.
What started out as a great celebration ends up as a great disappointment. The sign was clear, and yet the people, and the disciples as well, manage to misunderstand its meaning. They have not yet understood that Jesus is not some Jewish military hero, but the Bread of Life. And then night falls. Jesus remains alone with his Father. The crowds are left standing where they are; the disciples are left with no answer to the question “Where did he go?” They remain, symbolically as well as literally, in the dark. And then night falls.
Jesus did not come to satisfy our every desire and whim. We cannot manipulate or use him as a means to obtain our own self-centered ends: a miracle solution to our problems of health, money, self-esteem. We do not come to the Christ imposing our conditions on him: he must heal our broken relationships, give us success in our life and make sure we are materially and psychologically comfortable. We come to him on his conditions to receive the one and only thing that is worth seeking: himself.
The gift of God surpasses all the expectations and dreams of men. Not only does his gift surpass them, but it challenges and contests them. Jesus call us ceaselessly to go beyond our own desires. God gives without measure because he loves us without measure. What does love without measure mean? It means giving not just things but giving yourself. Jesus gives himself, fully and wholly, to us. He loves us without measure so that we can learn to love God and others without measure.
The sign is completed
The sign of Jesus feeding the five thousand is completed by a second sign: Jesus walking on the water. Together, these two scenes form a diptych (a double-panelled painting) depicting in advance the destiny of the Messiah and setting the stage for the great discourse on the Bread of Life. Unlike the parallel passages of Matthew and Mark, John’s account is less a miraculous rescue than a sign. Like all the signs, this one draws its meaning from Old Testament symbolism and prefigures a greater reality yet to come; it directs our attention to both the past and the future.
The account of the Feeding of the Five Thousand concluded with Jesus withdrawing to the mountain. Up until then, the disciples had been with him facing the crowd. Now, they part company. While Jesus goes up the mountain, they go down to the sea. 16 When evening came, his disciples went down to the sea, 17 got into a boat, and started across the sea to Capernaum. It was now dark, and Jesus had not yet come to them. (John 6.16-17.)
After waiting for Jesus in vain, the disciples sail for Capernaum, the town where Jesus had a house. Why did they leave without him? According to Matthew (14.22) and Mark (6.45), Jesus forced them to leave without him.
Immediately he made the disciples get into the boat and go on ahead to the other side, while he dismissed the crowds. (Matthew 14.22.)
The disciples are left on their own in the dark. The “evening” of verse 16 becomes the “dark” of verse 17. The Greek word scotia refers to the darkness that could not overcome the light of the Logos (John 1.5), but which continues to threaten to overtake men (John 12.35); this darkness does not envelop those who believe on Jesus (John 8.12; 12.46). In this passage, physical darkness is the image of the inner darkness that surrounds the disciples separated from their Master. It is nighttime because Jesus is not there! The disciples do not know where he is nor who he is. They are completely in the dark.
Who would have ever imagined, upon seeing the apostles head out to sea on the direct command of Jesus, that it was to head straight into a storm? And yet that is exactly where Jesus sent them. 18 The sea became rough because a strong wind was blowing. 19 When they had rowed about three or four miles, they saw Jesus walking on the sea and coming near the boat. (John 6.18-19.)
In biblical imagery (Psalm 107.23-30), storms underline the dread that the Hebrews had always felt toward the sea. Even though the Creator had enclosed the waters within fixed limits, the sea remains in the Bible the domain and the symbol of the evil powers that oppose God, in particular death. In Jewish thought, the Abyss is a close cousin of Sheol. To fulfill his purposes in the world, God triumphs over the sea. A good number of psalms celebrate the power of Yahveh over the great waters.
The voice of the LORD is over the waters; the God of glory thunders, the LORD, over mighty waters. (Psalm 29.3.)
You silence the roaring of the seas, the roaring of their waves, the tumult of the peoples. (Psalm 65.7.)
You rule the raging of the sea; when its waves rise, you still them. (Psalm 85.9.)
3 The floods have lifted up, O LORD, the floods have lifted up their voice; the floods lift up their roaring.
4 More majestic than the thunders of mighty waters, more majestic than the waves of the sea, majestic on high is the LORD! (Psalm 93.3-4.)
The Old Testament records no incident of a human being walking on the sea. However, of God himself it is written:
… who alone stretched out the heavens and trampled the waves of the Sea (Job 9.8).
Your way was through the sea, your path, through the mighty waters; yet your footprints were unseen. (Psalm 77.19.)
God alone rules over the sea and walks on the waves.
So, here we have darkness, the absence of Jesus, the strong wind stirring up the sea, the disciples struggling to row against the wind; and they were terrified (John 6.19). It is not the storm that terrifies them. Aboard the boat are at least four professional fishermen, the two pairs of brothers: Andrew and Peter, James and John. They have seen this kind of storm before. However, this is the first time they have ever seen a human form walking on the water.
49 But when they saw him walking on the sea, they thought it was a ghost and cried out; 50 for they all saw him and were terrified. (Mark 6.49-50.)
But he said to them, “It is I; do not be afraid.” (John 6.20.) Jesus dispels their fear, as God does in the Old Testament.
2 When you pass through the waters, I will be with you; and through the rivers, they shall not overwhelm you… 3 For I am the LORD your God, the Holy One of Israel, your Savior. (Isaiah 43.2-3.)
Then they wanted to take him into the boat, and immediately the boat reached the land toward which they were going. (John 6.21.) The verb lambano, which can mean either “receive” or “take” usually has a positive meaning in the fourth gospel. People receive the Logos (1.12), Jesus (5.43), his witness (3.11, 32; 12.48; 17.8), his envoys (13.20), God himself (13.20). The word becomes almost a synonym of “believe.” It is at the very instant that the disciples are ready to receive Jesus that they reach their destination, safe and sound. Here they are, “brought to their desired haven” (Psalm 107.30). This sign teaches the fundamental necessity of Jesus’s presence. The absence of Jesus spells catastrophe. The presence of Jesus spells peace. We have reached the safe haven. We have arrived.
For John, the miracle of walking on the water is above all a sign: it points to a much greater reality. What is this greater reality? Into which “mystery of the kingdom” (Luke 8.10) does Jesus want to initiate the disciples? In this episode, John sees a prefiguration of the great storm of Jesus’s passion: the great tempest that will threaten to engulf the disciples apparently left to themselves and wavering in their faith. How could we not see in this nighttime drama the disciples left alone huddled in fear after Jesus’s death?
There is a deeper meaning to what Jesus does in this chapter: he is deliberately staging a symbolic rehearsal of his Hour (his death, resurrection and ascension). Let’s run through it again. Jesus comes down from the mountain to provide for the needs of a whole people: he gives a miraculous bread which represents his body given in sacrifice.
“I am the living bread that came down from heaven. Whoever eats of this bread will live forever; and the bread that I will give for the life of the world is my flesh.” (John 6.51.)
He withdraws from the multitudes wandering around and completely lost in their dreams of a political Messiah, and he goes back up to the place from which he came: a clear allusion to his ascension to heaven to reign over the universe. “Then what if you were to see the Son of Man ascending to where he was before?” (John 6.62.)
In the meantime, Jesus sends his disciples on a mission without his physical presence.
“And now I am no longer in the world, but they are in the world, and I am coming to you.” (John 17.11.)
“As you have sent me into the world, so I have sent them into the world.” (John 17.18.)
The world where Jesus is sending his disciples will be hostile to them, like the contrary winds of the sea. “In the world you face persecution.” (John 16.33.) But Jesus will not leave them alone, he will come to them, treading on the Abyss, trampling the waters of death, to bring them peace.
18 “I will not leave you orphaned; I am coming to you. 19 In a little while the world will no longer see me, but you will see me; because I live, you also will live.” (John 14.18-19.)
“But take courage; I have conquered the world!” (John 16.33.)
The coming of the resurrected Christ will bring them peace, because they will finally have understood who he really is and what is the real nature of the deliverance he brings and of the kingdom he came to establish. “On that day you will know that I am in my Father, and you in me, and I in you.” (John 14.20.) Jesus will be there with them. They will not see him physically, but they will know he is there by his Spirit. (That is our case today in the tempest of our own times!)
But they are not there yet. It is true that in Matthew’s account, Jesus’s walk on the water elicits from the disciples a sort of confession of faith. And those in the boat worshiped him, saying, “Truly you are the Son of God.” (Matthew 14.33.) They begin to suspect that Jesus is the Messiah. But, it is clear that their idea of the Messiah is not much different than the nationalistic dreams of the crowd. In reality, they do not yet grasp the real identity and the real mission of their Master. The gospel of Mark is much franker.
51 Then he got into the boat with them and the wind ceased. And they were utterly astounded, 52 for they did not understand about the loaves, but their hearts were hardened. (Mark 6.51-52.)
Notice that in John 21, the seven disciples who are on the shore of this same Sea of Tiberias will no longer have to ask who Jesus is. Because by then, the will know who he really is. Now none of the disciples dared to ask him, “Who are you?” because they knew it was the Lord. (John 21.12.) How will they know that Jesus is the Lord and not just a human Messiah come to establish on earth some kind of revived Jewish empire? They will know it because the crucified, risen and ascended Christ will have come to them to explain, in the Holy Spirit and using the Old Testament scriptures, the Purpose of God, and they will have accepted his teaching.
Christian tradition has always seen the disciples’ boat as a figure of the Church. Augustine writes:
For that ship prefigured the Church while He is on high. … As the end of the world approaches, errors increase, terrors multiply, iniquity increases, infidelity increases; …. Darkness increases, and Jesus is not yet come. These are the waves that agitate the ship; the storms and the winds are the clamors of revilers. (Tractates on the Gospel of John, 25.5.)
We should find great encouragement today from the account of this sign, because our situation is a lot like that of the disciples. We live in a society that is fundamentally opposed to the things of God. We are surrounded by forces which work to prevent us from reaching our destination. Our culture “becomes rough,” like the Sea of Galilee, and it seems the harder we row, the faster we go nowhere.
In the midst of this storm, John reminds us that nothing can keep the Christ from getting us home, his home, the place where he has a house. He who has authority over the winds and the waves is more than capable of getting us across the stormy sea. But there is a condition: that we accept to take him into the boat with us.
The story does not end with the disciples landing at Capernaum, because it is also the story about the crowd to which Jesus had given bread. This crowd persists in its quest of a leader capable of fulfilling their human, earthy, carnal dreams.
22 The next day the crowd that had stayed on the other side of the sea saw that there had been only one boat there. They also saw that Jesus had not got into the boat with his disciples, but that his disciples had gone away alone. 23 Then some boats from Tiberias came near the place where they had eaten the bread after the Lord had given thanks. 24 So when the crowd saw that neither Jesus nor his disciples were there, they themselves got into the boats and went to Capernaum looking for Jesus. 25 When they found him on the other side of the sea, they said to him, “Rabbi, when did you come here?” 26 Jesus answered them, “Very truly, I tell you, you are looking for me, not because you saw signs, but because you ate your fill of the loaves.” (John 6.22-26.)
Their question expresses more than mere surprise. We can read in it the same possessive attitude which tried to take Jesus by force and make him king. They cannot let a man with such miraculous power get away. They want to keep him close to make sure he keeps supplying them with free bread. Notice that Jesus doesn’t answer their question. On the contrary, he reverses the roles. He becomes himself the interrogator and turns the discussion to the real problem: the state of their own hearts, their distorted, fleshly, self-centered, nationalistic hopes. That’s what keeps them going: false dreams. What keeps us going?
Jesus comes to us and offers us himself, the bread of eternal life. The problem is that our heart is too small for him. We don’t aim that high. We don’t demand that much. We would gladly settle for a Changer of water into wine, a Provider of magic water, a Multiplier of free loaves, a Calmer of storms: someone to ensure our material and psychological comfort. We would even settle for a religious good luck charm, a plastic Jesus to hang on the rearview mirror. But Jesus offers us infinitely more that what we think we want. He wants us to want more than we want so that we will want what he wants to give us.
“Do not work for the food that perishes, but for the food that endures for eternal life, which the Son of Man will give you.” (John 6.27.)
